Zyte alternative
datamint vs Zyte
A per-request scraping API priced by how hard each site is judged to be, sold against a monthly minimum commitment rather than a self-serve plan. Here is how the two compare, priced from published information rather than from a benchmark we ran.
Why teams switch
Why teams look for a Zyte alternative.
Usually one of three things: the bill is hard to predict, a target stopped returning content, or the shape of the response is wrong for the pipeline downstream.
- 1
The bill depends on a complexity class assigned to each site, so forecasting spend before a run is difficult.
- 2
The entry point is a monthly minimum commitment rather than a plan you can start and stop.
- 3
No included request volume is published at any tier, so cost per page has to be derived from the rate card.
Head to head
datamint and Zyte, side by side.
Every Zyte figure below comes from their published pricing, read on 20 September 2026. Where they do not publish a number, this table says so instead of estimating one.
$100 / month minimum commitment
$49 / month
Requests, priced per 1,000 by site complexity
Credits, $1 = 1,000 credits
$0.06 to $1.27 HTTP and $0.48 to $7.68 browser at the $500 commitment, by complexity
$0.66 standard at Scale; $9.97 stealth armor
A complexity class assigned to the target site, in five bands
The transport tier the request used: 1, 5, or 15 credits
Not published at any tier
60,000 credits at Builder, 450,000 at Scale
Separate rate line, $0.48 to $16.08 per 1,000 by complexity
5 credits per page
$100 at the first commitment tier
None
$5 trial credit, expires after 30 days
1,000 credits / month
Their pricing
What Zyte publishes.
Per-request rates quoted per 1,000 requests, varying by site complexity, with the rate set by the monthly commitment level. No included volume is published at any tier.
Per 1,000 requests, billed on usage
HTTP $0.13 to $1.27; browser rendered $1.01 to $16.08
No included volume; lower per-request rates
HTTP $0.10 to $0.95; browser rendered $0.75 to $12.00 per 1,000
No included volume; lower per-request rates
HTTP $0.08 to $0.76; browser rendered $0.60 to $9.60 per 1,000
No included volume; lowest published rates
HTTP $0.06 to $0.61; browser rendered $0.48 to $7.68 per 1,000
Volume discounts
Contact sales; rates not published
Free tier: $5 trial credit, no commitment, 30 days to use it. Source: https://www.zyte.com/pricing/, read 20 September 2026.
In their favour
Where Zyte is the stronger choice.
Teams pick them for these reasons, and switching does not solve any of them.
Rates fall as the monthly commitment rises, from pay-as-you-go down through $100, $200, and $500 minimums.
Browser rendering is on the same rate card as plain HTTP, so escalation is a rate change rather than a separate product.
A $5 trial credit with 30 days to use it and no commitment.
No overage penalties. Usage past the minimum bills at the discounted rate rather than a punitive one.
Where datamint differs
What changes if you switch.
How the two bill, and what they hand back, compared without a verdict on quality.
Zyte prices each request by a site complexity class it assigns, across five bands from Simple to Advanced. datamint prices by the transport tier a request actually used, published as 1, 5, and 15 credits per page.
Zyte's lowest commitment is $100 per month. datamint's entry paid tier is $49.
At the $500 commitment, Zyte's browser-rendered requests run $0.48 to $7.68 per 1,000 depending on complexity. datamint's dynamic render is 5 credits, or $3.32 per 1,000 at the Scale rate, and its stealth tier is 15 credits, or $9.97.
datamint's credit model
$1 = 1,000 credits. A request is routed across transport tiers automatically and billed at the tier that succeeded.
- Static fast HTTP fetch
- 1 credit / page
- Dynamic headless render
- 5 credits / page
- Stealth armor bypass
- 15 credits / page
- Structured schema extraction
- +2 credits / page
Questions
Before you switch.
Zyte publishes per-request rates. Is it cheaper?
On simple targets at high commitment, yes. At the $500 tier a Simple site costs $0.06 per 1,000 HTTP requests against datamint's $0.66. The comparison inverts as complexity rises: an Advanced site at the same commitment is $0.61 per 1,000 HTTP and $7.68 browser-rendered, and a page that escalates to datamint's stealth tier is $9.97 regardless of which site it is. Price your own target mix rather than the cheapest row on the card.
What decides which complexity band a request falls into?
Zyte assigns the class, and it is not derived from anything you control or can predict in advance. datamint's tier is a consequence of the request: a static fetch costs 1 credit, a headless render 5, stealth armor 15, and you are charged for the tier that succeeded.
Does Zyte have a free tier?
A $5 trial credit with 30 days to spend it, rather than a recurring monthly allowance. datamint's free tier is 1,000 credits every month with no card, which is 1,000 static fetches or 66 stealth armor renders.
Comparing more than one? See all comparisons.
Stop maintaining scrapers. Start shipping.
Point datamint at the targets your team keeps losing. Get typed data back, and stop rebuilding parsers every sprint.
1,000 credits free every month · No card required · Blocked requests cost nothing